What awoke Kant from his dogmatic slumber?
Abraham claims (xiv) that Kant was awoken from his dogmatic slumber because he accepted Hume’s criticism of this principle—Hume’s point being that we cannot know causal relations by pure reason.
What is the meaning of dogmatic slumber?
–Sincerely, “cs.” Dear Sir or Madam: Dogmatic slumber, that easy and comfortable state of resting on one’s unexamined assumptions, has been shown in multiple studies to be greatly desirable for promoting health of mind and body.
What did Kant refer to as dogmatic slumber?
Thus, in the famous “dogmatic slumber” passage, Kant might be referring either to the mid 1760s, when he then had a “remembrance” of reading the translation of Hume’s Enquiry, or to the mid 1770s, when he then had a “remembrance” of reading translations from the Treatise. We prefer the first alternative.
Who interrupted whose dogmatic slumber?
4 I do so also to indicate that Kant read Hume’s attack on the principle Ex nihilo, nihil fit as bearing on the principle of sufficient reason asserted by Leibniz, Wolff, Baumgarten, and the Kant of the Nova dilucidatio, and that it was the bearing of Hume’s attack on that principle that first interrupted Kant’s …
How did Hume wake Kant?
Kant was very impressed by Hume, and remarked that he had been ‘woken up from a long slumber’ after reading him. Hume was doubtful about how much we could know through reason, and regarded empirical matters of fact, ideas and impressions as being all important.
How did Hume wake up Kant?
Was Kant a rationalist or empiricist?
Kant is an empirical realist about the world we experience; we can know objects as they appear to us. He gives a robust defense of science and the study of the natural world from his argument about the mind’s role in making nature.
How do Kant and Hume differ?
Hume’s method of moral philosophy is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the necessity of grounding morality in a priori principles. Hume says that reason is properly a “slave to the passions,” while Kant bases morality in his conception of a reason that is practical in itself.